The Edge (and the Phantom Lord)

“At what point, I try to ask myself objectively, do statistically hazardous, entirely elective pastimes become unethical?  Put another way: to what degree, if at all, do we owe our self-preservation to those whom we profess to love, to our emotional and financial dependents?  At what point does a dangerous pastime, through its mere practice, constitute betrayal?  The question has another half: at what point, through abstinence from highly rewarding but hazardous activities on grounds of social responsibility, do we betray ourselves?  If so, and most important: how do we find a balance?” 

   – Andrew Todhunter, Fall of the Phantom Lord.

It’s a fascinating question to anyone who doesn’t climb, but obviously circular to anyone who does.  For most climbers, self-preservation is the reason to climb, not the reason not to.  It is that Edge – the physical climbing act and the risk that accompanies it – which makes everything else in life possible and pleasant.

On the other hand, perhaps the “Phantom Lord” Dan Osman did take it a little too far…

Advertisement

~ by wittmack on January 3, 2009.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.